10 Deadly smart contract risks to avoid at all costs

Smart contracts on blockchain hold immense potential, but they also come with significant risks (smart contract risks) that developers, users, and investors need to understand. As the adoption of decentralized apps and smart contracts grows, security vulnerabilities continue to result in exploits and losses totaling millions of dollars. From coding mistakes to access control issues, smart contracts are complex and easily flawed if not audited properly. To avoid catastrophic losses, it’s critical to identify and mitigate the biggest smart contract risks upfront.

By learning the most common pitfalls and following security best practices, you can help ensure your smart contracts avoid the million-dollar mistakes plaguing the ecosystem. With the right precautions, smart contract risks can be minimized for a more secure, successful deployment on the blockchain.


Understanding smart contract risks

Smart contract risks arise from vulnerabilities in the code, architecture, or dependencies that can be exploited. Key risks include:

  • Coding errors like bugs, logical flaws, and gas optimization failures – Thorough auditing is critical.
  • Access control issues allowing unauthorized operations – Limit permissions carefully.
  • Front-running and censorship via transaction ordering – Use decentralized oracles.
  • Oracle manipulation by falsifying external data feeds – Validate from multiple sources.
  • Reentrancy attacks that drain funds via state change bugs – Follow best practices.
  • Outdated libraries with unpatched holes – Always use the latest versions.
  • Insecure data storage enabling leaks – Limit on-chain data persistence.
  • Missing input validation enabling malformed inputs – Validate thoroughly.
  • Accidental admin keys and backdoors – Lock down access tightly.

Proactive risk assessment, diligent auditing, and following security best practices are key to avoiding exploits.


Assessing the dangers of coding errors

Coding mistakes like bugs, logic errors, unchecked conditions, etc. are a top source of risk:

  1. Bugs – Flaws in code logic paths.
  2. Typos – A character mistake can break functionality.
  3. Logic errors – Wrong workflow implementations.
  4. Unchecked errors – Failure to handle bad inputs.
  5. Race conditions from timing issues.
  6. Numeric over/underflows due to unrestricted sizes.
  7. Reentrancy due to state change ordering mistakes.
  8. Gas optimization failures – Locking user funds.
  9. Lack of comprehensive testing – Undiscovered flaws.

These coding risks can lead to irrecoverable loss of funds and data. Diligent auditing by professionals and incentivized bounty programs are critical to avoiding these pitfalls.


Avoiding critical smart contract flaws

Smart contract flaws enable different attacks leading to stolen funds, frozen accounts, data leaks, and broken functionality. Critical risks include:

  • Reentrancy – Manipulating execution ordering to defraud.
  • Front-running – Censoring transactions for profit.
  • Logic errors – Unintended behaviors from flawed code.
  • Oracle manipulation – Injecting falsified external data.
  • Insecure access controls – Unauthorized operations.
  • Vulnerable design patterns – Deviating from best practices.
  • Inadequate testing – Undiscovered flaws.
  • Outdated dependencies – Unpatched security holes.

Avoiding these flaws requires extensive stress testing, audits, formal verification, bug bounties, and incentivized attack modeling before launch.


Mitigating oracle manipulation dangers

Oracles pose risks by providing external data that attackers can falsify. Manipulation tactics include:

  • Front-running – Censoring transactions to distort data.
  • Sandwich attacks – Briefly manipulating prices.
  • Flash loan exploits – Manipulating on-chain liquidity.
  • Frontrunning – Exploiting sequence to manipulate results.

Mitigations include:

  • Decentralized oracles – Use multiple independent sources.
  • Oracle redundancy – Confirm data from multiple oracles.
  • Randomness – Add randomness to query ordering.
  • Monitoring – Detect anomalies indicating manipulation.
  • Sandboxing – Isolate damage from Oracle exploits.


Blocking reentrancy attacks on smart contracts

Reentrancy remains a top risk, enabling the draining of funds through recursive calls. Defenses include:

  1. Locking state changes – Update state before external calls.
  2. Rate limiting – Slow interactions to limit the damage.
  3. Pull over push payments – Don’t send funds until conditions are met.
  4. Code review – Check for state change bugs.
  5. Automated vulnerability scanning – Tools to detect risks.
  6. Bug bounties – Incentivize identifying flaws.
  7. Formal verification – Mathematically verify correctness.
  8. Upgradable contracts – Fix post-deployment.

Following secure development practices is critical for blocking reentrancy and other attacks.


Smart Contract Risks -TechPointy.com
Smart Contract Risks -TechPointy.com

10 deadly smart contract risks to avoid at all costs

Smart contracts carry significant risks that can lead to catastrophic outcomes if not properly secured. The top risks to avoid are:

  1. Reentrancy attacks – Recursive calls drain funds. Use locks and pull payments.
  2. Front-running – Censoring transactions for profit. Use decentralized oracles.
  3. Logic errors – Flawed code executes unintended behavior. Conduct extensive testing.
  4. Oracle manipulation – Falsified data injection. Validate from multiple oracles.
  5. Insecure storage – Data leaks from flawed designs. Limit data persistence.
  6. Access controls – Unauthorized operations. Restrict permissions.
  7. Inadequate auditing – Undiscovered vulnerabilities. Do comprehensive audits.
  8. Outdated libraries – Unpatched security holes. Always use the latest versions.
  9. Admin backdoors – Malicious logic risks assets. Lock down access.
  10. Fund locking – Freezing assets via bugs. Pause transactions if detected.

Avoiding these deadly risks requires diligent coding, auditing, and following security best practices.


Best practices for auditing smart contracts to identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities before launch

Thoroughly auditing smart contracts prior to launch is crucial to avoid exploits. Best practices include:

  1. Line-by-line code review – Identify any logic errors.
  2. Automated vulnerability scans – Tools find common coding issues.
  3. Manual penetration testing – Model real attacks.
  4. Formal verification – Mathematically prove properties.
  5. Trail of destruction – Target destroying contract assets.
  6. Experimental attacks – Test theoretical exploits.
  7. Bug bounties – Crowdsource finding flaws.
  8. Time testing – Check performance as data grows.
  9. Peer review from experts – Fresh eyes often find bugs.
  10. Testing across platforms – Ensure compatibility.
  11. Upgrading iteratively – Fix issues before the next release.


Following structured auditing processes maximizes identifying and fixing risks pre-launch.

A guide to risk management strategies to avoid exploits, data leaks, and losses from smart contract flaws

Managing smart contract risks requires a combination of practices:

  • Security audits – Rigorously test for vulnerabilities.
  • Bug bounties – Incentivize discovering flaws.
  • Formal verification – Mathematically verify correctness.
  • Cyber insurance – Covers losses from undetected risks.
  • Circuit breakers – Halt transactions during attacks.
  • Rate limiting – Slow interactions to limit the damage.
  • Monitoring – Detect abnormal behavior indicating exploits.
  • Sandboxing – Isolate components to limit the impact.
  • Upgradable contracts – Fix flaws post-deployment.
  • Asset compartmentalization – Limit loss from any single exploit.
  • Emergency pausing – Freeze transactions if needed.
  • White hat hacking – Work with ethical hackers to test.
  • Staying up-to-date – Follow developments and best practices.

Proactively assessing risks, testing vigorously, and having incident response plans are key to risk management.



Smart contracts introduce major security risks that can lead to irrecoverable losses if not properly understood and mitigated. However, with vigilant auditing, following best practices, and proactively managing risks, developers can harness the power of smart contracts while avoiding costly pitfalls.

A combination of formal verification, bug bounties, circuit breakers, upgraded contracts, and comprehensive testing will help secure smart contracts against the myriad of potential attacks. Addressing risks upfront will allow the true potential of self-executing smart contracts to be realized.


Smart Contract Risks -TechPointy.com
Smart Contract Risks -TechPointy.com


Q: What are the main smart contract risks?

A: The top risks are coding errors, reentrancy attacks, oracle manipulation, access control issues, logic flaws, insecure data storage, outdated libraries, and inadequate testing.

Q: How can smart contract risks be mitigated?

A: Best practices like extensive auditing, formal verification, bug bounties, circuit breakers, rate limiting, and following secure coding standards help mitigate risks.

Q: Can be lost funds due to smart contract risks be recovered?

A: No, transactions on the blockchain are irreversible, so any exploited funds cannot be recovered.

Q: What is a reentrancy attack on a smart contract?

A: A reentrancy attack recursively drains funds by manipulating the execution order of functions before the state is updated.

Q: How can untested smart contracts be secured?

A: Rigorous audits by professionals, bug bounties, and formal verification can help secure untested contracts.

Q: Do all smart contract risks originate from coding errors?

A: No, risks also stem from design flaws, oracle manipulation, outdated libraries, and inadequate testing.

Q: Can smart contract risks be eliminated?

A: No technology is 100% secure, but risks can be minimized by following security best practices.


Golden Quotes:

“Smart contracts don’t eliminate trust, they redistribute it to coders and auditors.”



Leave a comment